Public Sector Cuts Part-Time Shifts to Bypass Insurance Law
By ROBERT PEAR
FEB. 20, 2014 - New York Times
WASHINGTON — Cities, counties,
public schools and community colleges around the country have limited or reduced
the work hours of part-time employees to avoid having to provide them with
health insurance under the Affordable Care Act, state and local officials
say.
The cuts to public sector
employment, which has failed to rebound since the recession, could serve as a
powerful political weapon for Republican critics of the health care law, who
claim that it is creating a drain on the economy.
President Obama has twice delayed
enforcement of the health care lawfs employer mandate, which would subject
larger employers to tax penalties if they do not offer insurance coverage to
employees who work at least 30 hours a week, on average. But many public
employers have already adopted policies, laws or regulations to make sure
workers stay under that threshold.
Even after the administration said
earlier this month that it would ease coverage requirements for larger
employers, public employers generally said they were keeping the restrictions on
work hours because their obligation to provide health insurance, starting in
2015, would be based on hours worked by employees this year. Among those whose
hours have been restricted in recent months are police dispatchers, prison
guards, substitute teachers, bus drivers, athletic coaches, school custodians,
cafeteria workers and part-time professors.
Mark D. Benigni, the
superintendent of schools in Meriden, Conn., and a board member of the American
Association of School Administrators, said in an interview that the new health
care law was having gunintended consequences for school systems across the
nation.h
In Connecticut, as in many states,
significant numbers of part-time school employees work more than 30 hours a week
and do not receive health benefits. gAre we supposed to lay off full-time
teachers so that we can provide insurance coverage to part-time employees?h Mr.
Benigni asked. gIf I had to cut five reading teachers to pay for benefits for
substitute teachers, Ifm not sure that would be best for our students.h
In Medina, Ohio, about 30 miles
south of Cleveland, Mayor Dennis Hanwell said the city had lowered the limit for
part-time employees to 29 hours a week, from 35. Workersf wages were reduced
accordingly, he said.
gOur choice was to cut the hours
or give them health care, and we could not afford the latter,h Mr. Hanwell, a
Republican, said. The cityfs 120 part-time employees include office clerks,
sanitation workers, park inspectors and police dispatchers.
Mr. Hanwell said that new rules
issued by the Internal Revenue Service this month did not address the cityfs
fundamental concerns about the cost of providing health insurance.
Lawrence County, in western
Pennsylvania, reduced the limit for part-time employees to 28 hours a week, from
32. Dan Vogler, the Republican chairman of the county Board of Commissioners,
said the cuts affected prison guards and emergency service personnel at the
countyfs 911 call center.
In Virginia, part-time state
employees are generally not allowed to work more than 29 hours a week on average
over a 12-month period. Thousands of part-time state employees had been working
more than that, according to the state personnel agency.
Virginia officials said they could
not extend coverage to part-time wage workers because of the expense. Health
benefits cost the state an average of more than $11,000 a year per employee.
For months, Obama administration
officials have played down reports that employers were limiting workersf hours.
But in a report this month, the Congressional Budget Office said the Affordable
Care Act could lead to a reduction in the number of hours worked, relative to
what would otherwise occur.
Jason Furman, the chairman of the
presidentfs Council of Economic Advisers, reaffirmed the White House view that
the law was ggood for wages and incomes and for the economy over all.h
Since Mr. Obama signed the health
law in March 2010, the private sector has added more than eight million jobs.
But in the public sector, the picture is different.
Government employment at the
federal, state and local levels is lower today than in March 2010, by a total of
698,000 jobs, the Labor Department says. And in a recent survey, the National
Association of State Budget Officers found that gstates plan to reduce the
number of full-time employees againh this year.
It is not entirely clear how
private employers will respond, but as some government officials point out,
businesses at least have the option of passing along some of the additional
costs to consumers.
In Indiana, Daniel T. Tanoos, the
schools superintendent for Vigo County, which includes Terre Haute, said, gThe
school system has no way to increase prices as a private business can.h
To hold down the work hours of
school bus drivers, Vigo County has reduced field trips for children and cut
back transportation to athletic events. School employees who had two part-time
jobs totaling more than 30 hours a week — for example, bus driver and basketball
coach — were required to give up one of the jobs.
The Obama administration says
gthere is absolutely no evidenceh of any job loss related to the Affordable Care
Act. And the Congressional Budget Office says gthere is no compelling evidence
that part-time employment has increasedh as a result of the law.
But economists tend to focus on
the private sector, which employs more people and has been adding jobs, unlike
the public sector.
Republicans in Congress like
Representatives Tim Griffin of Arkansas, Mike Kelly of Pennsylvania and Todd
Young of Indiana said they knew of public employers in their states that had
restricted the hours of part-time employees.
Authors of the health care law
wanted more people to have insurance, Mr. Griffin said, but he asked: gWhat did
they get? No insurance and less pay. Genius! Thatfs a genius federal program
right there.h
Community colleges depend heavily
on part-time faculty members, who teach about 45 percent of all courses,
according to the American Association of Community Colleges. The association
praised the new rules, saying they would allow many community colleges to avoid
the expense of providing health benefits to part-time faculty members.
However, the denial of benefits
irks some instructors.
William J. Lipkin, an adjunct
professor of American history and political science at Union County College in
Cranford, N.J., said: gThe Affordable Care Act, rather than making health care
affordable for adjunct faculty members, is making it more unaffordable. Colleges
are not giving us access to health care, and our hours are being cut, which
means our income is being cut. We are losing on both ends.h
The American Federation of
Teachers lists on its website three dozen public colleges and universities in 15
states that it says have restricted the work assignments of adjunct or part-time
faculty members to avoid the cost of providing health insurance.
The University of Akron, in Ohio,
has cut back the hours of 400 part-time faculty members who were teaching more
than 29 hours a week, said Eileen Korey, a spokeswoman for the school.
gWe have more than 1,000 part-time
faculty,h Ms. Korey said. gFour hundred would have qualified for health
insurance. That would add costs that we cannot afford.h
© 2014 The New York Times Company